FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Scientology attempts to ban picketers due to their HIV status
Los Angeles, CA (1-12-09) – In a shocking new tactic attempting to ban peaceful protesters from picketing the Scientology compound known as “Gold Base” near Hemet, CA, Scientology lawyers have obtained medical information regarding two protesters, and are using their HIV positive status in an attempt to prevent them from picketing at the location.
Worldwide pickets against Scientology have surged in the last year, and Scientology has been fighting to stop them, especially near the Hemet compound. Scientology has used tactics ranging from physical attacks [1], false reports to police [2], and the emission of an estimated 110db organ note from loudspeakers in an attempt to drown out the protesters’ chants. [3]
The latest tactics, however, are downright sickening, illegal, and an insult to members of the LGBT community and HIV patients worldwide.
Attorney Graham Berry and activists “Angry Gay Pope” (AGP) and “Happy Smurf” (a former Scientologist) are openly homosexual. Scientology, which policy states that homosexuals are “low on the tone scale” and should be “disposed of quietly and without sorrow” [4], has obtained AGP and Happy Smurf’s private records and discovered that they are HIV positive. [5]
Scientology is lobbying for the passage of a county-wide ordinance restricting protesting at “Gold Base”. [6] Scientology considers the presence of the two HIV+ men to be a threat to the well-being of the alleged 500 “church workers” at the Base, and is seeking to restrict protests in a move that may constitute an restriction on 1st Amendment rights of activists in Hemet.
This is not the first time Scientology has openly spoken out against homosexuality. At the 2008 Toronto Gay Pride Parade, Scientologists made false claims of being able to cure homosexuality. [7]
Recently the Church of Scientology of California donated a generous sum of money to aid in the passing of Proposition 8, a law that banned marriage between homosexual couples. [8]
For more information on the protesters being discriminated against at “Gold Base”, see http://angrygaypope.com and http://www.grahamberry.com.
References:
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1RUQ7xwz3Y
[2] http://rinf.com/alt-news/activism/scientology-injunction-denied-against-anonymous/2783/
[4] http://www.solitarytrees.net/racism/dispose.htm
[6] http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-scientology10pg,0,5285738,full.story
[7] http://www.queerty.com/scientologys-anti-gay-push-thwarted-at-toronto-pride-20080710/
More discussion on this press release can be found here.
Pages: 1 2



















7 comments
I am glad you have brought some attention to the mystery of Juliette Lewis’s talking crotch. As you know this has puzzled me for awhile. Maybe we will finally get some answers.
I”ve been wondering what she looks like these days. now i know.
Why does it not surprise me that Juliette Wannabe is a Scifitologist? Next you’ll tell me Lady Caca is!
Finally someone that knows what they are talking about. As an Ex scientologist I can tell you Tommy is an outright liar. Thank you for writing this.
And by the way, disconnection doesn’t exist either does it Tommy!
[...] Juliette Lewis speaks from the heart (AgentBedhead) [...]
What’s the true story behind the bizarre situation in the Bahamas, with John Travolta going after the ambulance driver for “extortion”?
Sickeningly, this sounds like the identical tactic that has sometimes been used on others, who Scientology has wished to silence. Claim “extortion,” and other crimes, smear the person, destroy the person’s reputaion.
Hope that Travolta isn’t “applying Scientology” in this case.
Sadly, it’s entirely possible that he is.
For what it’s worth, here’s an update on the John Travolta/Bahamas situation (speculative):
The three individuals accused of “extortion” were approached by Travolta/Scientology and were being paid to shut up about what they witnessed. They were secretly recorded during conversations about potential hush money.
The recordings were edited to place them in a bad light – *or*, in the process of discussing the possible payment of hush money from Travolta/Scientology, they decided they rejected the idea altogether, or decided to go the the tabloids, and the decision was made to attack and destroy them through doctored recordings, etc.
What really happened?
Did John Travolta attempt to spin his son’s death to gain positive publicity? And did it begin to backfire when witnesses began to talk?
He *did* have photos of his son photo-shopped to change the shape of his face. Is that was a grieving parent does at the sudden death of a child? Just how Scientologically warped is the very *likable and charming* John Travolta?
One thing is for sure. Something shady is happening.