<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dolce &amp; Gabbana Get Defensive About The Offensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/</link>
	<description>Dirty Fingernails Firmly On The Pulse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10557</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10557</guid>
		<description>P.S.  If the image could only convey one thing, it&#039;s power to sell would be diminished because it would only appeal to people who get off on that single concept. It&#039;s doubtful that D&amp;G would want that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  If the image could only convey one thing, it&#8217;s power to sell would be diminished because it would only appeal to people who get off on that single concept. It&#8217;s doubtful that D&amp;G would want that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10556</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10556</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a photograph and is open to interpretion. Obviously it is meant to be sexually provocative.  But why assume it is meant to convey only one idea? As a heterosexual woman with the affliction described by flea, I can see how some women would interpret it his way. Men who are rapists, or have rape fantasies would probably see it as a rape scene.  Women who have fantasies of being raped might see it that way too. On the other hand, women who have fantasies of being consensually involved in sex with a group of men might look at it and see consensual group sex. Transvesites who fetishize the idea of themselves as women might see themselves in the woman depicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a photograph and is open to interpretion. Obviously it is meant to be sexually provocative.  But why assume it is meant to convey only one idea? As a heterosexual woman with the affliction described by flea, I can see how some women would interpret it his way. Men who are rapists, or have rape fantasies would probably see it as a rape scene.  Women who have fantasies of being raped might see it that way too. On the other hand, women who have fantasies of being consensually involved in sex with a group of men might look at it and see consensual group sex. Transvesites who fetishize the idea of themselves as women might see themselves in the woman depicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I R A Darth Aggie</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator>I R A Darth Aggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10555</guid>
		<description>Try this as a caption under the advert:



&lt;i&gt;I do NOT eat tuna tacos, bitch! Thank you, God, that I&#039;m gay (and much better looking that John Edwards).&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this as a caption under the advert:</p>
<p><i>I do NOT eat tuna tacos, bitch! Thank you, God, that I&#8217;m gay (and much better looking that John Edwards).</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtyDisher</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10554</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtyDisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10554</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t even buy thier crap at garage sales now. Rape isn&#039;t sexy and DnG has gotten aged looking. It&#039;s a rerun of a rerun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t even buy thier crap at garage sales now. Rape isn&#8217;t sexy and DnG has gotten aged looking. It&#8217;s a rerun of a rerun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flea</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator>Flea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10553</guid>
		<description>I still contend this is a group of OBVIOUSLY GAY men attempting emergency fashion resuscitation. I also this this ad obviously privileges the impossible desire of certain tragic, beautiful women - who shall remain nameless - to be the object of desire of the aforementioned OBVIOUSLY GAY men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still contend this is a group of OBVIOUSLY GAY men attempting emergency fashion resuscitation. I also this this ad obviously privileges the impossible desire of certain tragic, beautiful women &#8211; who shall remain nameless &#8211; to be the object of desire of the aforementioned OBVIOUSLY GAY men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10552</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/dolce-gabbana-defensive-about-the-offensive/#comment-10552</guid>
		<description>Interesting how they initially blamed it on people who are &quot;behind the times,&quot; but when the &quot;human interest groups&quot; screamed (rightfully), they caught on.  It was OK if they think it&#039;s just silly old-fashioned (traditional) types complaining, but when those free-thinking, hip &quot;human interest groups&quot; (progressives) complain, they learn it&#039;s not OK.



Got it.



Amoral idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how they initially blamed it on people who are &#8220;behind the times,&#8221; but when the &#8220;human interest groups&#8221; screamed (rightfully), they caught on.  It was OK if they think it&#8217;s just silly old-fashioned (traditional) types complaining, but when those free-thinking, hip &#8220;human interest groups&#8221; (progressives) complain, they learn it&#8217;s not OK.</p>
<p>Got it.</p>
<p>Amoral idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

