How is it possible that Scarlett Johansson has lost so very much sexual allure in just a few short months? It’s not just the shrinking bustline but more like the entire package that is, well, lacking. Even the recent plum-tinted hair hue hasn’t improved, but the Elle France editors have, noticeably, engaged in some Photoshop trickery. The benefits of soft lighting and some handy desaturation actions do help somewhat, but we still want the old Scarlett back.
11 comments
Forgive me for pulling a BarbadoSlim, but considering folks pretty much kept slamming her for her old look as a talentless blonde bimbo, I can’t see why anybody will have reason to complain now that she took steps to rectify such a tragic mistake of being too pretty.
Well, except those of us who actually liked her like that.
Poor kid looks like she’s brain damaged.
Actually I think she looks great like this…but I hope she doesn’t get any thinner.
Looks like her boobs took a hit! Eat a hamburger, Scar . . .
I’ll never understand why she can’t just always look like she did in Lost In Translation. She was so good in that movie and looked gorgeous as all hell, naturally blonde and boobalicious.
I am sort of ok with the new Scarlett Johansson.
I’m kinda shocked. Those photos? not so flattering. In fact, I am acquainted with two women who are far better looking.
[...] Terrorists are holding ScarJo’s former sexiness to ransom [Agent Bedhead] [...]
[...] the topic of Scarlett Johansson’s starvation boobs yet again, especially since it seems like we reached a verdict last time, but, seriously: [...]
Sooo, b/c she is brunette and less inflated, she’s now unsexy? I think NOT. So she no longer looks like a Barbie/blow-up doll. She’s gorgeous anyway.
Umm…
I think she looks as gorgeous as always. But I’m a girl. What do I know?