Irregardless of Scarlett Johansson’s continuing misadventures and delusions of grandeur, one thing cannot be denied — the girl has one hell of an hourglass figure, which is a hell of a lot more appealing than, say, that of Keira Knightley or Victoria Beckham. Scarlett covers the August 2008 issue of Cosmopolitan, and, in doing so, she reminds us of her recent interview STAR Magazine:
I try to stay fit, but I’m not the type to become unnaturally thin. I don’t want to become part of that trend. And I am far too paranoid about my health to take the road of eating disorders. There’s a weight I like to maintain, which is slim but healthy. I’m never going to be 5′ 11″ and 8 stone [sic] but I feel lucky to have what I’ve got. Women shouldn’t be forced to conform to an unrealistic and unhealthy body image
Check out more of Scarlett’s figure and catch some of the enduring promotional buzz for Vicky Cristina Barcelona at Cosmopolitan.com.
No comments
“Irregardless” is not a word. REGARDLESS of where a listed definiton of it may be found.
Around here, we use the double negative for emphasis.
It offends many.
Irregardless, I’d love to rip that dress right off her, and have her tie me to the bedpost with it, and then have her way with me.
She is but a young child, who needs my gentle hand to guide her
She forgot to thank Photoshop, which is obviously responsible for the right side of her rib cage in the above picture.
Um…photoshop does wonders to improve a girls physique. She is not that tiny-waisted. Still…she’s nicely curvy.
I think if I liked girls Scarlett would be way up on my list along with Daisy Fuentes
She’s lovely, Photoshop or no. It’s nice to see a woman who refuses to starve her boobs off so that she looks “good”.
Photo shop can do the miracle,you can mold by editing the pictures or any other things by editing as you have seen in this picture.She is smart but you can visible the things also all around in it.
she is glamorous and i like her eyes and dress is superb