This morning, one of the top stories in Matt Drudge’s omnivorous lint-trap of world events was a link to the Sun showing Prince Harry, the latest embarrassment to the House of Windsor (or Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, or whatever alias thay’re traveling under these days), copping a feel off some Sloane Ranger/chavette. Tsk, tsk. The Sun, which invented the concept of the topless Page Three girl back in 1970 and made gave national exposure to the budding hooterettes of Samantha Fox when the girl was sixteen, was appalled.

Except it turns out the story was, err, not entirely accurate. Most notably, the photo is at least three years old. Also, the Sun has been less than forthcoming about explaining how the pic came into their possession. Clarence House, who made the charge, says this is the third time this year the Sun has run misleading pictures of the prince. It’s almost like they already know the story they want to tell, and they’re not going to let the facts get in their way. Some people even do that with more serious stories.

Agent Bedhead, folks: your trustworthy source of celebrity dirt. Reputable. Reliable. Not affiliated in any way with the mainstream media.